Below is a table outlining my pianist categories and rating scale, as well as a second one with ratings for the pianists whose discographies and blog entries I have completed to date.

Category	Rating Scale
Solo Interpretation (20 points)	18-20 = sublime; 15-17 = excellent; 12-14 = good; 9-11 = fair; 6–8 = mediocre; 1–5 = poor
Collaborations (10 points)	9–10 = sublime; 7–8 = excellent; 5–6 = good; 3–4 = mediocre; 1–2 = poor
Technique (10 points)	9–10 = sublime; 7–8 = excellent; 5–6 = good; 3–4 = mediocre; 1–2 = poor
Versatility (5 points)	4–5 = excellent; 3 = good; 2 = mediocre; 1 = poor
Legacy (5 points)	4–5 = excellent; 3 = good; 2 = mediocre; 1 = poor
Total Score (50 points)	45–50 = sublime; 38–44 = excellent; 33–37 = very good; 29–32 = good; 23–28 = fair; 16–22 = mediocre; 5–15 = poor

	Solo Interpretation	Collaborations	Technique	Versatility	Legacy	Total Score (Out of 50)
Curzon, Clifford	10	7	5	3	2	27
Lhévinne, Josef	13	6	10	1	4	34
Long, Marguerite	14	7	8	2	2	33