Below is a table outlining my pianist categories and rating scale, as well as a second one with ratings for the pianists whose discographies and blog entries I have completed to date.
| Category | Rating Scale |
| Solo Interpretation (20 points) | 18-20 = sublime; 15-17 = excellent; 12-14 = good; 9-11 = fair; 6–8 = mediocre; 1–5 = poor |
| Collaborations (10 points) | 9–10 = sublime; 7–8 = excellent; 5–6 = good; 3–4 = mediocre; 1–2 = poor
|
| Technique (10 points) | 9–10 = sublime; 7–8 = excellent; 5–6 = good; 3–4 = mediocre; 1–2 = poor |
| Versatility (5 points) | 4–5 = excellent; 3 = good; 2 = mediocre; 1 = poor |
| Legacy (5 points) | 4–5 = excellent; 3 = good; 2 = mediocre; 1 = poor |
| Total Score (50 points) | 45–50 = sublime; 38–44 = excellent; 33–37 = very good; 29–32 = good; 23–28 = fair; 16–22 = mediocre; 5–15 = poor |
| Solo Interpretation | Collaborations | Technique | Versatility | Legacy | Total Score (Out of 50) |
| Curzon, Clifford | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 27 |
| Lhévinne, Josef | 13 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 34 |
| Long, Marguerite | 14 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 33 |
| | | | | | |
